The Universal Selection Source:
Cosmetics Ingredients
Industry News

Hair Care Products Need Strict Regulatory Check, Suggests Northwestern Report

Published on 2017-07-13. Author : SpecialChem

A new study by Northwestern Medicine reports consumer complaints more than doubled for cosmetic products from 2015 to 2016, with hair care products being the biggest offender. But consumers remain at risk because the industry receives little regulatory scrutiny and does not require pre-approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Hair Care Products Need Strict Regulatory Check

Adverse Effects of Cosmetic Actives

Many cosmetic products entice consumers with active ingredients that will plump, lengthen and boost. But the cost, depending on the product, may be serious injury or worse.

Corresponding author Dr. Steve Xu, a resident physician in dermatology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, said:

"The FDA has much less authority to recall cosmetics from the market in stark contrast to drugs or medical devices. It’s harder for the FDA to get harmful cosmetics off the shelves.”

Loopholes in Scrutinizing

Since cosmetic manufacturers are not required to submit adverse health events to the FDA, the current data sources to track product safety are significantly limited. Even though there were more than 5,000 events reported to the FDA from 2004 to 2016, it’s likely only the tip of the iceberg, Xu said. He suspects many events are not reported by consumers or doctors.

Xu said:

“This is really a wake-up call. The point of the paper is to broaden the awareness of this database and the need for everyone to participate in reporting adverse events from cosmetics.”

The most common complaints in the database were for hair care products, skin care products or tattoos, the study found. The number of overall adverse events jumped from 706 in 2015 to 1,591 in 2016, with hair care products seeing the largest increase. Baby products, unclassifiable products, personal cleanliness products, hair care products and hair coloring products had the highest proportion of self-reports of a serious adverse health outcome, such as serious injury, death, disability.

Xu said:

“This is a $430 billion-a-year global industry with millions of products on the market. But we are only getting, on average, between 200 and 400 adverse events per year. That represents significant under-reporting. If we want more public safety and to keep dangerous products off the market, the first step is the make sure we have reasonably good data. The key point of our results is we don’t have it.”

Ongoing Investigation

In 2014, the FDA sent letters to manufacturers Chaz Dean and Guthy Renker LLC in response to 127 consumer complaints of hair and scalp problems related to the WEN by Chaz Dean Cleansing Conditioners. Only then did the FDA discover that the manufacturers had already received 21,000 consumer complaints of scalp irritation and alopecia.
Hair Care Products Need Strict Regulatory Check, Suggests Northwestern Report

Xu said:

“If this was a drug, the story would be much different in regards to regulatory action. Three or four people can be wrong, but it’s hard to ignore 21,000. It’s concerning when 21,000 people complained to the manufacturer, and the FDA received only 127 of those due to poor reporting from the manufacturer.”

The FDA’s investigation on WEN by Chaz Dean Cleansing Conditioner products is ongoing, and the products are still available, Xu said.

Problem with Cosmeceuticals

What concerns Xu the most are products that contain cosmeceuticals, which market themselves as cosmetic products but with an “active ingredient.”

Xu said:

“Although not explicitly studied, this cosmetic product class is becoming a growing problem. Many of these products are really making drug-like claims but are skirting the FDA approval pathway by presenting themselves as a cosmetic. At the very best, these products are making unsubstantiated marketing claims for products that may or may not work. At the very worst, there are actual drug components in these products that can cause real harm.”

Additionally, Xu said he hopes the study’s findings raise awareness of Sen.Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) Personal Care Products Safety Act, which aims to tighten cosmetic regulation.

Xu said:

“Feinstein’s bill is a first step forward in the right direction. I would have liked an explicit push towards cosmeceutical regulation. Overall, the FDA should have the power to order recalls and mandate that manufacturers declare their products’ ingredients and report every adverse consumer health event to the FDA.”

PS: If you liked this News, you might enjoy our Cosmetics Industry Newsletter. All the Industry News delivered once a week right to your inbox. Sign up here!

Source: Northwestern Medicine
2 Comments on "Hair Care Products Need Strict Regulatory Check, Suggests Northwestern Report"
Clive W Jul 13, 2017
Xu just wants companies to have to spend even more money on FDA approvals. The existing process is bad enough since the vast sums involved act to shut out new innovators. Meanwhile products that are demonstrably dangerous continue - shampoos for instance that contain Methylisothiazolinone (banned in Europe - allowed in the USA)
Michael K Jul 13, 2017
It is unfortunate that such a blanket impression is voiced pertaining to the Cosmetic industry needing to be better regulated. The large multi-nationals have extensive research, testing and regulation arms that insure that only the safest and efficacious products are launched to market. As the size of the marketer decreases one sees that this high level of testing decreases. Honestly, the industry at a whole gets a black eye when small marketers take risky short-cuts in introducing new products. Although these products often are truly innovations, we must still protect the consumer and all our collective reputations. Coming from a large multi-national, I can honestly attest that the level of consumer complaints was low and that such an incident such as the WEN consumer complaints would have immediately prompted a recall along with a withdrawal from the market.

Leave a comment

Your email address and name will not be published submitting a comment or rating implies your acceptance to SpecialChem Terms & Conditions
Back to Top